School Accountability Report Card    
School Year 2000-2001

 

School Information

District Information

 School Name

 Rivergold Elementary

 District Name

 Coarsegold Union Elementary

 Principal

  Bob Rose

 Superintendent

  Bill McCabe

 Street

 31800 Road 400

 Street

 45426 Road 415

 City, State, Zip

 Coarsegold, CA    93614-9501

 City, State, Zip

 Coarsegold, CA    93614

 Phone Number

  559-658-7566

 Phone Number

  559-683-2996

 FAX Number

  559-658-7244

 FAX Number

  559-683-4160

 Web Site

  www.coarsegoldusd.com

 Web Site

  N/A

 Email Address

  brose@coarsegoldusd.com

 Email Address

  bmccabe@yosemiteuhsd.com

 Enrollment

387

 SARC Contact

  Bob Rose

 Grades Served

  K-6

 

 


School Description and Mission Statement

 Rivergold Elementary is a K-6 school with a student population of 387, and, along with Coarsegold Elementary and the Coarsegold Community Day School, serves the Sierra foothill community of Coarsegold, CA.  Madera County Office of Education maintains a Special Education Department on the Coarsegold campus currently serving 43 students.  A Home School Program is in place on the Rivergold campus, and a successful gifted education (GATE) program, called Junior University, was implemented in 1999-2000.

 

Reading is a very important part of Rivergold.  Students at Rivergold have met the Governor’s Reading Challenge the past two years with the “Rivergold Reads Program”.  A Library Technician manages our school library.  It is the desired goal in our adopted Library Plan that the district libraries eventually are served by a full time district librarian as well as the library technicians. 

 

Commencing with the 1996-1997 school year, the district has elected to participate, to the maximum level, in the class size reduction program.  Currently, all kindergarten through third grade classrooms have a better than 20 to 1 student/teacher ratio.  Rivergold will expand to K-8 in 2003 and 2004.

COARSEGOLD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT

MISSION STATEMENT

Coarsegold Union School District is dedicated to providing the structure and support, in a partnership with students, parents, staff, and the community of Coarsegold, necessary to insure that every student receives the highest quality education in a positive, safe, secure learning environment in order to become a productive, healthy, intellectually curious member of our society. 


Opportunities for Parental Involvement

 Contact Person Name

  Carol Holt  (PTA President)

 Contact Person Phone Number

  559-658-7566 ext 2106

 The school is well served by the parents and community.  Rivergold has an active PTA, which provides funding and activities for the students, such as a Book Fair, Reflections Art and Photography Program, Science Day, Spelling Bee, community movie nights and school wide fundraisers.  Parents and community members provide many hours of assistance to our students.  We are very proud of the hundreds of hours our volunteers provide each month.  Local businesses are generous and cooperative in responding to student fund-raising efforts.  The School Site Council is active and meets regularly to govern school programs and categorical funding.


 I. Demographic Information

Student Enrollment
The percentage of students is the number of students in a racial/ethnic category divided by the school's most recent California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) total enrollment.

 Racial/Ethnic Category

 Number
of Students

 Percentage
of Students

 Racial/Ethnic Category

 Number
of Students

 Percentage
of Students

 African-American

1.3 

 Hispanic or Latino

43 

11.4 

 American Indian or Alaska Native

12 

3.2 

 Pacific Islander

0.8 

 Asian-American

2.4 

 White (Not Hispanic)

305 

80.7 

 Filipino-American

0.0 

 Other

0.3 


 II. School Safety and Climate for Learning

School Safety Plan

 Date of Last Review/Update

  Spring 2001

 Date Last Reviewed with Staff

 Spring 2001

 Acting Principal Cindy Simons updated the plan in the Spring of 2001.  It has been reviewed with staff and can be implemented in case of an emergency.  Two-way radios allow direct access to the site administrator and office.  Regular monthly meetings are held with all staff to discuss safety concerns.  Safety concerns are treated with immediate responses by administration and maintenance staff, as appropriate. 


School Programs and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment

 Rivergold has a monthly reward program called “Super Hawks”.  Those students that are following the 5 R’s of Rivergold (Respect, Responsibility, Ready to Learn, Reaching Academic Standards, and Rising to Their Potential) are recognized by their teacher and the principal each month.



 

 

 

 

 

Suspensions and Expulsions
The number of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents. The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents divided by the school's California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) total enrollment for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the district-wide average for the same type of school.

 

 School

 District

 1999

 2000

 2001

 1999

 2000

 2001

 Suspensions (number)

12 

12 

68 

47 

56 

 Suspensions (rate)

.020 

.030 

.031 

.068 

.047 

.056 

 Expulsions (number)

 Expulsions (rate)

.001 


School Facilities

 Rivergold is celebrating our 10th anniversary.  Our facility is clean and well kept.  The principal and site head of maintenance inspect the school grounds weekly. Rivergold consists of 60% permanent buildings and  40% portables with a multi-purpose room, computer lab and library.  The Rivergold campus is expanding to 7th and 8th grade over the next two years and will add portable buildings to meet the needs of the 7-8th grade program.


 III. Academic Data

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
Through the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) in English Language Arts and Mathematics in grades 2-11, and Science and History-Social Science in grades 9-11; and the Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition (Stanford 9), which tests Reading, Language, Mathematics (grades 2-11), Spelling (grades 2-8), and Science and History-Social Science (grades 9-11 only).

California Standards Tests (CST)
The California Standards Tests show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets standards), Basic (approaching standards), Below Basic (below standards), and Far Below Basic (well below standards). Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level have met state standards in that content area.

English Language Arts (ELA)
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 1999

 2000

 2001

 1999

 2000

 2001

 1999

 2000

 2001

 2

 --- 

 --- 

 58

 --- 

 --- 

 52

 --- 

 --- 

 32

 3

 --- 

 --- 

 57

 --- 

 --- 

 48

 --- 

 --- 

 30

 4

 --- 

 --- 

 44

 --- 

 --- 

 40

 --- 

 --- 

 33

 5

 --- 

 --- 

 48

 --- 

 --- 

 40

 --- 

 --- 

 28

 6

 --- 

 --- 

 56

 --- 

 --- 

 50

 --- 

 --- 

 31


ELA Subgroups (More than 10 Students Per Grade Level with Test Results)
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

   Male  

 Female

 Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 2

 53

 63

 67

 55

 3

 48

 64

 43

 61

 4

 41

 47

 42

 45

 5

 44

 57

 28

 56

 6

 47

 64

 53

 57


Stanford 9
Reading and mathematics results from the Stanford 9 test are reported for each grade level as the percentage of tested students scoring at or above the 50th percentile (the national average). School results are compared to results at the district and state levels.

Reading
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 1999

 2000

 2001

 1999

 2000

 2001

 1999

 2000

 2001

 2

 58

 60

  83

 56

 56

  75

 44

 49

 51

 3

 59

 75

  69

 61

 69

  64

 41

 44

 46

 4

 65

 80

  76

 55

 70

  67

 41

 45

 47

 5

 62

 75

  78

 61

 70

  71

 42

 44

 45

 6

 66

 64

  75

 63

 68

  67

 44

 46

 47


Mathematics
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 1999

 2000

 2001

 1999

 2000

 2001

 1999

 2000

 2001

 2

 60

 71

  88

 62

 71

  80

 49

 57

 58

 3

 60

 76

  84

 67

 73

  76

 48

 56

 59

 4

 75

 59

  75

 68

 62

  68

 44

 51

 54

 5

 75

 82

  86

 72

 79

  83

 45

 50

 54

 6

 70

 83

  80

 74

 87

  80

 50

 55

 57

 

Stanford 9 Subgroups - Reading
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

   Male  

 Female

 Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 2

  84

  81

  83

  82

 3

  63

  75

  43

  78

 4

  68

  82

  55

  82

 5

  74

  86

  67

  82

 6

  68

  81

  72

  76


Stanford 9 Subgroups - Mathematics
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

   Male  

 Female

 Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 2

  86

  89

  92

  86

 3

  85

  82

  71

  88

 4

  65

  81

  54

  80

 5

  86

  86

  80

  88

 6

  69

  89

  72

  82

  
Local Assessment

Our district has implemented a Local Assessment Program.  We will be compiling and presenting Local Assessment Program data in future editions of the School Accountability Report Card.

Academic Performance Index (API)

The Academic Performance Index (API) is a score on a scale of 200 to 1000 that annually measures the academic performance and progress of individual schools in California. On an interim basis, the state has set 800 as the API score that schools should strive to meet.
Growth Targets: The annual growth target for a school is 5% of the distance between its base API and 800. Actual growth is the number of API points a school gained between its base and growth years. Schools that reach their annual targets are eligible for monetary awards. Schools that do not meet their targets and have a statewide API rank of one to five are eligible to participate in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP), which provides resources to schools to improve their academic achievement.
Subgroup APIs and Targets: In addition to a whole-school API, schools also receive API scores for each numerically significant racial/ethnic and socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroup in the school. Growth targets are also set for each of the subgroups. Each subgroup must also meet its target for the school to be identified as having met its target.
Percentage Tested: In order to be eligible for awards, elementary and middle schools must have at least 95% of their students in grades 2-8 tested in STAR. High schools must have at least 90% of their students in grades 9-11 tested.
Statewide Rank: Schools receiving an API score are ranked in ten categories of equal size (deciles) from one (lowest) to ten (highest), according to type of school (elementary, middle, or high school).
Similar Schools Rank: This is a comparison of each school with 100 other schools with similar demographic characteristics. Each set of 100 schools is ranked by API score from one (lowest) to ten (highest) to indicate how well the school performed compared to schools most like it.

API criteria are subject to change as new legislation is enacted into law. More detailed and current information about the API and public school accountability in California can be found at the California Department of Education website at http://api.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal

 

 

 

 

 


School Wide API

 

 API Base Data

 

 API Growth Data

 1999

 2000

 2001

From 1999
to 2000

From 2000
to 2001

From 2001
to 2002

 Percentage Tested

  100

 100

100 

 Percentage Tested

 100

 99

 --- 

 Base API Score

  733

 788

806 

 Growth API Score

 788

 806

 --- 

 Growth Target

  3

 1

* A

 Actual Growth

 55

 18

 --- 

 Statewide Rank

  8

 8

 Eligible for Awards

 Yes

 Yes

 --- 

 Similar Schools Rank

  4

 7

 Eligible for II/USP

 

 

 --- 

*A means the school scored at or above the interim Statewide Performance Target of 800 in 2001

 

API Subgroups - Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

 

 API Base Data

 

 API Growth Data

 1999

 2000

 2001

From 1999
to 2000

From 2000
to 2001

From 2001
to 2002

 Base API Score

 

 712

760 

 Growth API Score

 

 759

 --- 

 Growth Target

 

 1

 Actual Growth

 

 47

 --- 



 

 IV. Class Size

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution
Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms for each range of students, by grade level as reported by CBEDS.

 Grade

 1999

 2000

 2001

 Avg

 1-20

 21-32

 33+

 Avg

 1-20

 21-32

 33+

 Avg

 1-20

 21-32

 33+

 K

 18.0

 2

 0

 0

 18.5

 2

 0

 0

 15.5

 2

 0

 0

 1

 15.0

 1

 0

 0

 18.0

 2

 0

 0

 20.0

 1

 0

 0

 2

 19.0

 2

 0

 0

 16.0

 1

 0

 0

 17.0

 1

 0

 0

 3

 18.5

 2

 0

 0

 19.3

 3

 0

 0

 16.7

 3

 0

 0

 4

 24.0

 0

 2

 0

 23.5

 0

 2

 0

 25.5

 0

 2

 0

 5

 23.5

 0

 2

 0

 22.5

 1

 1

 0

 23.5

 1

 1

 0

 6

 29.5

 0

 2

 0

 28.5

 0

 2

 0

 23.3

 0

 3

 0

 K-3

 15.5

 2

 0

 0

 18.3

 3

 0

 0

 18.0

 5

 0

 0

 3-4

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 18.0

 1

 0

 0

 4-8

 21.0

 0

 1

 0

 23.0

 0

 1

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 Other

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0



 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Teaching Load and Teaching Load Distribution
Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms for each range of students, by subject area as reported by CBEDS.

 Subject

 1999

 2000

 2001

 Avg

 1-22

 23-32

 33+

 Avg

 1-22

 23-32

 33+

 Avg

 1-22

 23-32

 33+

 English

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 1.0

 3

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 Mathematics

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 Science

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 Social Science

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0

 0.0

 0

 0

 0


Class Size Reduction Participation
California's K-3 Class Size Reduction program began in 1996 for children in kindergarten and grades one through three. Funding is provided to participating school districts to decrease the size of K-3 classes to 20 or fewer students per certificated teacher.

 Grade Level

 Percentage of Pupils Participating

 1999

 2000

 2001

 K

 100%

 100%

100% 

 1

 100%

 100%

 100%

 2

 100%

100% 

 100%

 3

 100%

 100%

100% 


 

V. Teacher and Staff Information

Teacher Credential Information
Part-time teachers are counted as '1'. If a teacher works at two schools, he/she is only counted at one school. Data are not available for teachers with a full credential and teaching outside his/her subject area.

 

   1999  

   2000  

   2001  

 Total Number of Teachers
 

 21

 23

 24

 Full Credential
 (fully credentialed and teaching in subject area)

 20

 21

 20

 Teaching Outside Subject Area
 (fully credentialed but teaching outside subject area)

 

 

 

 Emergency Credential
 (includes District Internship, University Internship, Pre-Interns and Emergency Permits)

 1

 2

 4

 Teachers with Waivers
 (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit)

 0

 0

 0



 

 

 

 

 

 

Teacher Evaluations

The site principal, in accordance with the CTA contract, carries out teacher evaluations.  The principal has been trained in teacher professional development, accountability, supervision, and evaluation through administrative classes. Evaluation is a positive developmental process, designed to promote maximum teacher competency.  Teachers are encouraged to try bold and innovative lessons without the fear of negative evaluation, with the emphasis being improvement.  The principal visits the classrooms on a scheduled and unscheduled basis throughout the year.  Each teacher is given a list of factors that may be considered during a formal lesson observation, based on the California State Teaching Standards.  At post-observation conferences, teachers are encouraged to provide input concerning lesson strengths and areas for improvement.  Peer observation and coaching are encouraged, and the staff can take advantage of the PAR (Peer Assistance Review) program.


Substitute Teachers

 There is a pool of highly qualified substitute teachers available to the schools.  Each substitute candidate must have a minimum of a BA degree and have passed the CBEST. 

 

 

VI. Curriculum and Instruction

School Instruction and Leadership

The instructional program at each school is closely aligned with the standards set forth in the State Standards and Frameworks. An on-going process of self-assessment is in place.  The staff is highly professional, dedicated, and focused on improving student learning.

 

Administrative assessment of instruction is continual, and includes walk-through and drop-in visits, informal observations, and formal observations.  Teachers participate in a District Curriculum and Staff Development Committee, School Site Council, many other school and district committees, staff meetings, district and site grade level meetings, and training days to improvement instruction.  Developmental and instructional professional growth opportunities are provided based on staff needs and administrative direction.

 

The district leadership team, consisting of the Superintendent, Principals, and Vice-Principal is pro-active, well trained, and dedicated to district wide effectiveness.  Administrators are active and visible on campus daily, and are accessible to parents, to all staff members, and to students.  The team meets weekly to analyze and plan for the improvement of all aspects of the instructional program.  The team also includes other management personnel, including food services, transportation, maintenance, budget, and human resources. 


Professional Development

Teacher and staff training are planned and implemented using staff needs assessments determining the type of training needed.  The entire staff has been trained in implementing the state standards in Math and English-Language Arts, developing and using an intervention model, and using appropriate student assessment tools.  Teachers and staff are offered release time from their classrooms to attend specific in-service opportunities based on their own needs or interests.  Teachers are also encouraged to take advantage of a variety of opportunities for professional improvement.  Teachers are encouraged to become specialists in given areas and to share their expertise with other staff members.

 

 

 

Professional Development cont.

It is an administrative goal to provide each teacher with the opportunities to develop maximum professional excellence.  Teachers and administrators together determine professional development goals and directions, both for individual growth and whole-staff professional emphasis.  Recent trainings in Math and Literacy Core are examples of professional development.

 

District in-service days for the 2000-01 school year were focused on Standards, Development of Intervention Strategies, and Developing District Assessments.  This year, the district has planned three in-service days, outside of the instructional year.  Topics include Reading Assessments, ADD/ADHD Children, and Writing Improvement.


Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials

 The school district provides students with textbooks that are state-approved and are in the current adoption cycle.  The Board of Trustees has approved the California Department of Education Standards for English-Language Arts, Math, and History-Social Science as our district standards.  Science standards were also adopted in the 2000-2001 school year.  Textbooks are available for each student.  The district purchased books according to the state instructional adoption cycle and the district is on schedule.  Teachers have been trained on the standards’ content, and in implementing the standards in the daily instructional program. 

 

Instructional Minutes (School Year 2000-2001)
The California Education Code establishes a required number of minutes per year for each grade. The table below compares the number of instructional minutes offered at the school level to the state requirement for each grade.

 Grade
Level

 Instructional
Minutes
Offered

 State
Requirement

 K

36,900 

 36,000

 1

50,820 

 50,400

 2

 50,820

 50,400

 3

 50,820

 50,400

 4

60,720 

 54,000

 5

60,720 

 54,000

 6

 60,720

 54,000

 

Total Number of Minimum Days

 The district provides a one hour early release on Wednesdays for in-service and staff development.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal and Expenditure Data

Average Salaries (Fiscal Year 1999-2000)
Average Salary uses the statewide data category used for comparison by type and size of district (from Management Bulletin 01-02)

 Category

 District Amount

 State Average
For Districts
In Same Category

 Beginning Teacher Salary

 $30,086

 $29,679

 Mid-Range Teacher Salary

 $44,094

 $44,849

 Highest Teacher Salary

 $52,880

 $51,416

 Average Principal Salary

 $62,255

 $66,943

 Superintendent Salary

 $74,476

 $84,869

 Percentage of Budget for Teacher Salaries

 45.4

 41.5

 Percentage of Budget for Administrative Salaries

 5.3

 5.9

 
Expenditures (Fiscal Year 1999-2000)

 District

 District

 State Average
For Districts
In Same Category

 State Average
All Districts

 Total Dollars

 Dollars per Student
(ADA)

 Dollars per Student
(ADA)

 Dollars per Student
(ADA)

 $5,107,687

 $5,407

 $5,462

 $5,705